Perez Hilton posted a picture on Twitter of Miley Cyrus that looked like she was not wearing any underwear. The Internet is scandalized!
So did she or didn’t she? Is this child pron?
It looks like Miley was indeed wearing underwear and is a victim of an optical illusion and paparazzi who have no shame pointing the camera at her crotch panty or no panty – or just your good ol’ Photoshop, take your pick. Those who want to believe will say they see her vajayjay. (Just like they did with that poor girl on So You Think You Can Dance last year). But really — she was wearing underwear — it was on a film shoot for her new video.
Everyone is up in arms because Perez Hilton’s original tweet made it appear that Miley didn’t wear any underwear — and he had no shame in posting a picture of a 17-year-old’s “private parts”.
“If you are easily offended, do NOT click here Oh, Miley! Warning: truly not for the easily offended!”
And you know how I found out about this? Twitter has been down for an hour because everyone is trying to search for “Miley Cyrus Vag” or whatever. (Update: Twitter is down on it’s own… LOL, completely unrelated to Miley)
@god, I hate the news.
Photos from MileyCyrus.net